I have been a successful middle school teacher. I know it sounds strange when I call myself successful, but I have received recognitions at the school and county levels for the quality of my teaching. I have a big dilemma this year. I have two students who are not your ordinary students. Selena is a Hispanic student who is an English Language Learner, but her English proficiency is quite high. She fully participates in all class activities, she functions well in group and individual work, and she is always motivated. She is an ideal student. However, she never makes passing grades on tests. Her current grade is an F. Shelly is a White student. She shows no interest in course activities. You cannot even know if she listening or not most of the time. She chooses not to do group work. If I force her, she does not really contribute. She also does not turn in any assignments. What puzzles me is that she usually receives the highest grades in tests. Her current grade in my course is a high B. If she had turned in the assignments, her grade would be an A. The course grade in my class is determined mainly based on what students make on tests, because I feel that tests are the only means for me to know whether students have retained what they learned or not. Lately I have been thinking that my grading is not doing justice to Selena. At the same time, I think Shelly does not deserve a B with the attitude she has displayed. I need to revise my assessment system. Please help me with this.
Based on what you have shared, your grading system seems a bit dated. Current best practices for assessing student understanding no longer limits the students' ability to demonstrate their understanding to a multiple-choice test. I recently participated on a focus group that reviewed best practices in grading and then discussed grading policies. Our goal was to articulate the significance of each grade a student earns. Based on that work, we developed the following descriptors grades: A: The student achieved a high standard of excellence by continually demonstrating complete mastery of required knowledge and skills. The student continually applies this knowledge and skill to new concepts and serves as an academic leader in the classroom; B: The student achieved basic course standards by consistently demonstrating understanding of most required knowledge and skills. The student often applies this knowledge and skill to new concepts; C: The student inconsistently met the course standards by demonstrating understanding of some, but not all, of the required knowledge and skills. The student was inconsistent in the application of this knowledge and skill to new concepts; and F: The student did not meet the course standards due to demonstrating minimal understanding of the required knowledge and skills. Nowhere in our grade descriptors did we blend academic ability and student conduct. Best practice supports that the two are separate identities. Based on our review of this literature, we developed the following descriptors for conduct grades: A: The student continually demonstrates scholarly attributes of preparation for class, active participation in class, on-task behavior, and respect towards teachers and peers. The student serves as a leader and model of expected behavior; B: The student consistently demonstrates expected behavior through consistent preparation for class, participation in class, on-task behavior, and respect towards teachers and peers; C: The student inconsistently demonstrates expected classroom behavior. The student may inconsistently prepare for class, inconsistently participate in class, demonstrate some off-task behavior, and/or inconsistently show respect towards teachers and peers; and F: The student does not demonstrate expected classroom behavior. The student is rarely prepared for class, rarely participates, demonstrates excessive off-task behavior, and/or shows disrespect towards teachers and/or peers. I recommend getting to know your students as individuals. Based on the successes you have enjoyed, I perceive you will enjoy this endeavor. There is a plethora of student surveys available to help you do this. I also recommend that you learn about differentiated assessments (e.g., project-based, multiple-intelligence-based, differentiated learning styles-based, etc.). I have attended five Staff Development for Educators conferences. The first conference transformed my practice significantly, and I highly recommend this to help you in your journey to better assess student learning.
I enjoyed reading this idea. I will use this in the future for sure!
When revising your assessment system, I would focus on adding a variety of different types of assessments to meet the diverse needs and learning styles of your students. I would also recommend differentiating your assessments. Some students in your class may need more of a challenge and others may need accommodations. It appears that Selena knows the content but is unable to demonstrate her knowledge on the tests. This could be because she is an auditory learner who can tell you what she knows but has trouble expressing her ideas on paper. Maybe she has trouble reading the tests or the layout of the test is overwhelming to her. Using a variety of assessment types will give each student a chance to demonstrate what they have learned in a way that works best for them, and may help you assess what the students have actually learned rather than just how they perform on tests. I do not think that putting too much weight on one type of assessment is beneficial to the students or the teacher.
I agree with you. Sometimes it can be difficult to had culturally relevant information into content based assessments. Complex language can be reduced to simple text that will be more likely understood by a ELL.
That is a great idea to work with partners. This is a way in which both of the students can be successful and learn from each other. Also, a grade can be given for group work. Sometimes children learn better from their peers. This is a different way for the students to be assessed. I believe that both students can be successful this way.
I completely missed the fact that Shelly's issue may only be group work. With that in mind, Shelly may be more willing to complete assignments on her own. Some students get anxious in social situations and this could possibly be Shelly's problem. The teacher could try to get to the root of Shelly's lack of motivation by one-on-one conversations, and then progress with possible solutions.
As a special education teacher, I can really relate to your posting. It is difficult for struggling students to make good grades on tests. Special education students are already behind when compared to their peers. It is great that you are a teacher who believes in giving grades for formal as well as informal assessments.
For starters, we are not called upon to "grade" attitude. I would much rather a student learn the content and be grumpy, then for them to be full of life and energy and clueless. As far as the student with the bad attitude goes, I would continue to give her the grade she earns. The last time I checked, attitude is not one of the Common Core standards that students are expected to master. As for Selena, is it very possible that your assessments are somewhat biased, though likely unintentionally. I would look for an alternative way to assess her learning; a way that provides her with the opportunity to display her knowledge in an alternative form. I is possible that she "does" understand, she just may not be able to explain it. If I asked my 16 month old daughter if she wants a cookie, you better believe she is thinking "yes!" However, if I asked her to write down her response on paper, she would never get a cookie would she?